ArdorComm Media Group

Tuesday, August 25, 2026 7:57 AM

censorship

Government Mulls Mandatory CBFC Certification for OTT Film Releases; ZEE5 May Face Action Over ‘Satluj’

The Central government is considering amending the Information Technology (IT) Rules, 2021 to make Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) approval mandatory for films before they are released on OTT platforms. The proposed move follows the controversy surrounding the release of the film ‘Satluj’, which was streamed without CBFC certification. According to government sources, the proposed amendment would require all films intended for OTT release to obtain censorship clearance before being made available to viewers. At present, OTT content is not governed by the CBFC certification process, making changes to the IT Rules necessary to implement such a requirement. The government is also examining possible action against streaming platform ZEE5, which released Satluj while the film was reportedly still under review by the CBFC. Sources said the certification board had suggested multiple edits to the film before its release. The film was removed from ZEE5 just two days after its July 3 release following a government directive citing national security concerns. Officials clarified that while the Centre can regulate online streaming under the IT Rules, screenings of uncertified films at private venues fall under the jurisdiction of state governments. Directed by Honey Trehan, Satluj is based on the life of human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra, who exposed the cremation of thousands of unidentified bodies in Punjab during 1984–1994 before he was allegedly abducted and killed by police personnel in 1995. Despite its removal from OTT platforms, the film has reportedly been screened at private venues, including several gurdwaras in Punjab. The issue has gained political attention ahead of the state’s Assembly elections scheduled for next year. Under Part III of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has the authority to invoke Section 69A of the IT Act to block online content that falls outside the CBFC’s regulatory framework. The provision allows the government to restrict digital content on grounds such as national security, sovereignty, public order, and the integrity of India. Government sources also indicated that a Centre-appointed committee reviewing Satluj has recommended that the ban on the film’s public availability through online streaming platforms should continue, citing concerns that its content may affect India’s sovereignty and integrity. Source: PTI

Government Mulls Mandatory CBFC Certification for OTT Film Releases; ZEE5 May Face Action Over ‘Satluj’ Read More »

Israel’s Media Crackdown Sparks Press Freedom Concerns

The Israeli government’s unanimous decision to sanction Haaretz newspaper has intensified concerns over press freedom in the country. On November 24, Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi proposed the measures, citing Haaretz’s critical reporting on the Israel-Hamas conflict and remarks by its publisher Amos Schocken advocating international sanctions on Israeli leaders. The sanctions include halting government advertising in Haaretz, a boycott of official contact with the newspaper, and canceling state and state-owned employee subscriptions. Minister Karhi, in defense of the decision, labeled Haaretz’s content as “poison against the state and the army” and reiterated the government’s stance on freedom of expression not extending to state-funded criticism. Media Solidarity and Outcry The move has drawn sharp criticism from press freedom advocates and media organizations. Noa Landau, deputy editor-in-chief of Haaretz, stated the newspaper “will not be deterred,” while Anat Saragusti of the Israeli Journalists’ Union called it an attempt to undermine journalism as a democratic gatekeeper. Nahum Barnea of Yedioth Ahronoth highlighted the government’s focus on silencing dissent amid ongoing national security concerns, writing, “Our government was busy addressing the question… How to financially screw over a media outlet.” Broader Media Clampdowns This decision aligns with other government actions targeting critical media. Earlier, public broadcaster Kan faced attempts to reduce its influence. Additionally, the so-called Al Jazeera law allowed for the closure of foreign media offices, including Al Jazeera’s operations in Israel and the West Bank, under national security grounds. Legal Challenges Ahead Analysts expect Haaretz to challenge the boycott in Israel’s Supreme Court, questioning the legality of withholding government advertising due to political disagreements. Media watchdogs warn that such measures erode democratic norms. Despite mounting pressures, Haaretz remains defiant, pledging not to become a “government pamphlet.” The developments have raised broader questions about the state of press freedom in Israel as the government tightens its grip on critical voices in the media landscape. Source: frontline Photo Credit: frontline

Israel’s Media Crackdown Sparks Press Freedom Concerns Read More »