ArdorComm Media Group

Thursday, March 12, 2026 3:13 AM

Reservation Policy

IIM Indore releases PGP 2026–28 admission criteria; increases weightage for Class 12 scores and PI

The Indian Institute of Management Indore has announced the admission policy for its flagship two-year PGP programme for the 2026–28 cohort, introducing notable shifts in evaluation weightages. The institute will continue with its three-tier selection system, factoring in CAT 2025 performance, academic records from Classes 10 and 12, work experience, and scores in the personal interview (PI). To be considered, applicants must appear for CAT 2025 and clear both the sectional and overall percentile benchmarks. For General and EWS candidates, the minimum overall requirement is 90 percentile, with 80 percentile in each section. The cut-off is 80 percentile for NC-OBC, and 60, 45 and 45 percentile for SC, ST and PwD applicants, respectively. At the shortlisting stage, Class 12 marks remain a major determinant, carrying 25% weightage, while Class 10 marks contribute 10%. CAT sectional scores make up 55% of the composite score, with 3% allotted for work experience and 7 marks for diversity. Shortlisted candidates will receive interview calls in January 2026, with offline interviews planned across Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Indore, Kolkata, and Mumbai. The institute has kept the option open for conducting interviews online if required. For the final admissions list, the PI holds the highest influence with 45% weightage. CAT sectional scores carry 40%, while Class 10 and 12 scores add 5% each. A 5-mark diversity factor is also included. Importantly, meeting cut-offs alone does not ensure selection—candidates must achieve minimum performance standards in every PI parameter to qualify. The institute will adhere to the Government of India’s reservation norms: 27% NC-OBC, 15% SC, 7.5% ST, up to 10% EWS, and 5% PwD. All candidates, regardless of category, must still achieve the minimum performance thresholds set by IIM Indore. For students whose Class 10 or 12 results were altered due to COVID-era board evaluation policies, score weightages will be proportionally reassigned to other components such as CAT sectional scores and available board marks. The institute has also clarified that the admission process may be updated in line with any new government or institutional guidelines. Source: Indian Express

IIM Indore releases PGP 2026–28 admission criteria; increases weightage for Class 12 scores and PI Read More »

UGC NET June 2025 Result Date Announced by NTA: Check Full Details

education news

The National Testing Agency (NTA) has officially confirmed the result declaration date for the UGC NET June 2025 exam. As per the latest update, the results will be released on July 22, 2025. Candidates who took the exam can access their results through the official UGC NET website: ugcnet.nta.nic.in. This announcement was made through NTA’s verified X (formerly Twitter) account. Exam and Answer Key Timeline The UGC NET June 2025 examination was conducted from June 25 to June 29, 2025. The provisional answer key was issued on July 5, followed by the objection window, which remained open from July 6 to July 8, 2025. Result Declaration Process Explained The NTA follows a structured, multi-step process to determine eligibility and final results: Step I: A total of 6% of the candidates who appeared in both papers of the NET exam will qualify for eligibility as Assistant Professor, based on their performance and qualifying degree.  Step II: These qualifying slots are distributed among different categories as per the Government of India’s reservation norms.  Step III: Candidates must appear for both papers and obtain at least:  40% aggregate marks (for General and EWS categories)  35% aggregate marks (for reserved categories including SC, ST, OBC-NCL, PwD, and Third Gender) Step IV: Subject-wise qualifying cutoffs are calculated based on the number of slots available for each category. For example, in the subject ‘Economics’ for the SC category, the cut-off will be determined by the aggregate scores in both papers.  Step V: The total Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) slots are then allocated among various categories according to the reservation policy of the Government of India.  For further information, detailed criteria, and to check the result once it’s live, candidates are advised to visit the official UGC NET website: ugcnet.nta.nic.in. Source: Hindustan Times

UGC NET June 2025 Result Date Announced by NTA: Check Full Details Read More »

Madras High Court Rules: Reservation Policy Inapplicable to Government Law Officers

The Madras High Court has ruled that the reservation policy mandated under Article 16(4) of the Constitution does not apply to law officers engaged by the government. The court emphasized that law officers, appointed by the government, do not hold civil posts, and hence, the relationship between them and the government is not that of a master and servant. A Bench comprising Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy highlighted the government’s duty to appoint the most competent and meritorious lawyers for legal representation. The court asserted that, as the law officers do not hold civil posts, Article 16(4) of the Constitution, which deals with reservations, is not applicable to such appointments. The judgment underscored the importance of merit as the sole criterion for selecting law officers. The ruling came in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in 2017 by Thol Thirumavalavan, a local political leader, seeking reservation for women, Scheduled Caste (SC), and Scheduled Tribe (ST) communities in the appointment of law officers in the Madras High Court and subordinate courts in Tamil Nadu. The court dismissed the PIL, stating that the government’s duty to protect public interest obligates it to engage the most proficient and capable individuals, making merit the primary consideration in such appointments. The court also rejected arguments based on government orders and office memoranda advocating reservation for contractual employees, emphasizing that such provisions apply to individuals in the employment of the government, which does not include law officers. The verdict highlights the unique nature of the relationship between the government and law officers, grounded in trust and confidence, and asserts that the selection process for law officers is transparent and not arbitrary.

Madras High Court Rules: Reservation Policy Inapplicable to Government Law Officers Read More »